Notes on a Scandal
For several days Manila and the blogosphere were riveted to the $70,000 blog. Its revelations were so titillating that readers actually got more information than they wanted. It even started to write itself—anonymous commenters sent the stories spinning off in many directions while offering insights into celebrity culture, class warfare, and changing social mores. It raised questions as to cyberspace jurisprudence. For a few days, it may have been bigger than the NBN ZTE scandal. Plus I could not get The Smiths’ song Panic out of my head.
Last night the blog came to an end (Note: That was at 11; things change quickly), and you could feel the city’s withdrawal symptoms. Two people at dinner actually shrieked, “NO!” As someone put it, “Ay, balik-ZTE na naman.” The discussion turned to whether the scandal had helped perpetuate those in power by distracting the public from the previous, more expensive scandal.
This whole affair is a demonstration of the power of new media. Yesterday, Noel and I were wondering if the papers would pick up the story. (The story itself may have been minor by news standards, but the audience reaction was not.) We quickly realized that this would just be a formality. More people have probably read that blog than read the papers. In the digital age, you get information direct from the source, raw and unfiltered, but without the benefit of the fact-checking, copy-editing, objectivity, analysis, and intellectual rigor that print media and television are supposed to bring to a story.
If food just shot out of your nose, you are not alone. The traditional media have been remiss in their responsibilities, not just here but everywhere. They have set their audience adrift without a paddle in an ocean of information. And they wonder why they’re losing the audience to blogs. If our guides have deserted us, we might as well make our own way.
For perspective, from the Guardian: The world’s 50 most powerful blogs.
P.S. Old media pick up the story when everyone (or everyone who would take an interest) has already heard it. The scandal is not the story, how news of it spread is the story.
March 13th, 2008 at 11:05
miz jessica,
it’s still on…i just checked. am totally riveted. gravah ini indeed….
March 13th, 2008 at 11:26
Yes, he said the blog was officially over last night. But right now, that entry was removed and some posts were visible again, including the comments.
March 13th, 2008 at 16:06
i’m sorry, but i must have missed this one. what are you guys talking about? anong blog ito? akala ko si eliot spitzer nung nakita ko yung title.
at least give us the link to the blog.
March 13th, 2008 at 16:18
hah. it’s back on again.
March 13th, 2008 at 17:18
i was slow on this latest chika. only two posts are visible on the blog right now, but his feed is still alive!
March 13th, 2008 at 20:40
It’s funny, I was thinking of writing about that issue and using the same title.
With all these happening, I’m getting this little Beatles song “Revolution” in my head. Actually, I like Jim Sturgess’ version in Across the Universe too!
March 14th, 2008 at 01:36
a lot of the earlier posts were removed but you can still see them (including the juicy comments) by using google’s cache.
March 14th, 2008 at 05:31
Those big networks would have a field day making a freak show out of a niche phenomenon again. Not a complaint, I just find it annoying.
March 14th, 2008 at 07:16
ay, kras ko si JUm Sturgess. Sa Across the Universe lang a.
March 14th, 2008 at 11:17
kissmymike, i like jim sturgess’ version of the beatles songs in across the universe, too, but the movie made me sleep.
March 14th, 2008 at 17:06
As of 5:04 pm today the entire blog is up and running, but without the comments.
March 15th, 2008 at 00:30
it’s still up. hindi pa daw sya nabayaran