It’s all my fault, I jinxed Roger Federer.
I know, I know, there’s no need to break the news to me, I’m actually here. I was so sure this would be Roger Federer’s Wimbledon number 7 and Grand Slam number 17 that I didn’t bother to watch the match.
In the morning I went to Highgate Cemetery (You have to say “HIGH Get SEMetree” or they won’t know what you mean), having finally figured out the public transport system,
and in the afternoon I went to the Victoria & Albert Museum, which has the best gift shop of all the museums I’ve seen in London.
At six I met up with Rian and casually asked for the Wimbledon news. I meant the Murray-Tsonga match, which has everyone on edge. He said, “You seriously don’t know?” Aaaaaargh!
It’s my fault, I’m clearly the jinx. First time I turn up at SW19 and Roger loses in the quarters. “We’re going to need some drinks,” I said, so we went to the Fifth Floor Bar and Restaurant at Harvey Nichols, where Edina and Patsy of AbFab liked to shop and behave badly.
“Could we still have the champagne afternoon tea even if it’s after six, please, we need it?” we asked the lovely waiter. “Why not,” he said.
So between the champagne, scones and clotted cream and cries of “Darling, it’s a Lacroix!” we agreed that we would root for Andy Murray at Wimbledon because I like England and they really, Really need to win something. Their Wimbledon drought has lasted longer than their football World Cup drought; their last men’s singles champion is now a shirt, that’s how long it’s been.
How can I be so flippant when the Fed has just crashed out of Wimbledon? Here’s my rationalization. Roger and I are in sort of the same boat (minus several million dollars, megawatts of fame and talent, and an actual boat). We’re content. Life is good. For now. The Fed’s having a terrible summer—he will be (gasp) number three after this loss—so he will have the old hunger pangs again, and I’ll be going home soon and and when I realize I’m broke, I’ll have the old hunger pangs again. So all will be well again, that is, unwell. Darling, it’s a Lacroix. And look, that extremely tall guy in the purple shirt looks like Casey Affleck, only hunky. I love London.
July 1st, 2010 at 08:25
Sana may contest hulaan kung sino ang mananalo at ang prize kahit Wimbledon Towel
Gentleman and Ladies Single (sabay curtsey)
Novak Djokovic
Tsvetana Pironkova
For sure this year ay single status ang mananalo, lahat na yata ng married player ngayon ay talo na siguro bagot na sila sa may buhay asawa nakita ko game ni Clijsters parang desperate housewife ang dating nya walang kagana gana maglaro at si Roddick din mukhang desperate husband naman eh ganda ganda ng wife nya, game nila ni Kim parang walang motivation for me sa tennis eh momentum is the name of the game na kailangan all the time.
Bakit kaya nawawalan ng momentum sa mga game nila ang mga champion kapag nag asawa na Roddick, Federer, Clijsters, Henin(divorce), Date, Tanasagurn at ang walang kupas na si Patricia Hy Boulais???…………..matagal ng retired yang si Patricia Hy Boulais gusto ko lang sinasabi ang name nya kasi ang sarap at it feels good.
July 1st, 2010 at 12:39
@Swanoepel: Clijsters won the US Open after getting married and having a kid a! And Roddick wasn’t going to win another grand slam anyway.
Apparently, Federer has a right leg and back injury which has been bothering him since Halle. I’ve noticed that he has been taking some pace off from his serve since his first round match against Falla. His serve just doesn’t have the same venom, especially his second serve which just sits up. He’s very passive with his forehand, and very sluggish running around his backhand. Then he turns up in his second round match with heavy strappings in his leg.
Federer’s last losses in slams: Del Potro, Soderling, Berdych. Trend?
I was kinda disappointed by Roger’s presser. Gave Berdych little credit and blamed the loss to the injury.
July 1st, 2010 at 16:14
He(Douglas Adams) still got his towel… Nice
July 1st, 2010 at 23:42
I watched the match yesterday, it was a heart breaker. Err.