We’re not great believers in prizes—we do not accept “multi-awarded” as a proper word and we demand that anyone who describes himself thus be clubbed unconscious with his trophies. However we were delighted when Julian Barnes was awarded this year’s Booker Prize for his novel, The Sense of an Ending. It was a very satisfying outcome not just because it was Barnes’s fourth time on the shortlist but because of the flap over Booker chair Stella Rimington’s statement that she was looking for “readable” books.* Julian Barnes writes elegant, subtle, inventive fiction that also happens to be readable.
We have been fans of Barnes since the 90s when we read Talking It Over, a love triangle narrated by its protagonists. (That novel has had a big influence on our use of pronouns—”…put their head round the door”). Afterwards we read A History of the World in 10 1/2 Chapters, whose narrator is most…unusual. The Sense of an Ending features Barnes’s most interesting narrator: a man who doesn’t get it.
Welcome to The Sense of an Ending Reading Group. We’ve prepared a few guide questions which you should feel free to ignore; the aim is to have an open discussion about the novel. Anyone who’s read TSOAE may join the discussion—post your thoughts in Comments. If your copy of TSOAE came from us, we expect scintillating insights haha.
* * * * *
Warning: If you have not read The Sense of an Ending, this discussion contains spoilers.
1. Characters. What do you think of Tony Webster? Is your impression at odds with what Tony Webster thinks of Tony Webster? Do you know anyone who’s like him? Does he remind you of you?
What about Veronica, Adrian, Margaret and Sarah? (Sarah as in Old Testament Sarah who gave birth in her old age?) Do you agree with Tony’s assessment of them? This is a narrator who has edited his life so he can live with himself. What has he left out? Clearly his feelings about Veronica were more complex than he’s let on. What do you think their relationship was really like?
2. Images. The novel opens with them. We can’t get wrists out of our minds: the watch worn facing inwards, Veronica wanking, Adrian’s suicide. And then semen sluicing down the drain, contrasting with the upstream tidal wave. The Thames and the bloody bathwater. What image or scene in the novel has stayed with you?
Did Tony forget or did he fail to mention something that happened while they were watching the Severn Bore?
3. Style. Tony Webster is your classic unreliable narrator: his memory is faulty, his credibility wonky. (Julian Barnes has cited the unreliable narrator classic, The Good Soldier by Ford Madox Ford. Read it, it’s harrowing. So what IS a reliable narrator? Isn’t anything first-person dubious?) When did it occur to you that Tony is not a trustworthy witness to his own life? That you may know more about him than he does? How does Barnes achieve this effect?
What do you think of Barnes’s style? “Readable” or requiring more effort than usual?
4. What does the title mean to you? No points for mentioning Frank Kermode.
5. If you have not read the book, stop reading this post right now. Almost the minute we finished reading this novel we started reading it again. What did we miss? What were we looking for, and how could we find it in these pages when Tony doesn’t remember or has chosen to forget it?
What do you think happened? Why the will? Tell us the story of Tony, Adrian, Veronica and Sarah in chronological order.
6. Anything you’d like to add?
* * * * *
We’re doing an Ambeth and bringing in the chismis. The Sense of an Ending turns on the nasty letter that Tony writes to his clever friend Adrian and ex-girlfriend Veronica after they announce that they are dating. We could not help thinking of the nasty letter that Julian Barnes reportedly wrote his clever friend Martin Amis. They also fell out over a woman—Barnes’s wife Pat Kavanagh, who had been Amis’s literary agent until he dumped her for a famous New York shark. According to Amis that letter ended with two words, seven letters, three of them f’s.
* * * * *
*Incidentally the 2012 Booker jury will be chaired by Peter Stothard, editor of the Times Literary Supplement, acclaimed diarist and classicist. Not only does next year’s chair have impeccable literary credentials but he knows that JessicaRulestheUniverse exists and he has cited us in his TLS blog. Clearly the president of the Classical Association was joking when he mentioned our comment about Phaeton, but we liked the “web-friend” reference.