Three Novels of New York: The House of Mirth, The Custom of the Country, The Age of Innocence by Edith Wharton, with an Introduction by Jonathan Franzen. Penguin Classics Deluxe Edition, Php899 at National Bookstores
On the 150th anniversary of Edith Wharton’s birth, at least three new novels have reimagined her work for the contemporary audience.
We have not yet read Victoria Patterson’s This Vacant Paradise and Claire McMillan’s The Gilded Age, two modern takes on Wharton’s The House of Mirth. We are reading The Innocents by Francesca Segal, practically a remake of The Age of Innocence. It is interesting to note that all three are debut novels, presumably homages to their common literary ancestor.
The Innocents by Francesca Segal, hardcover, Php995 at National Bookstores.
For Wharton fans (and admirers of Martin Scorsese’s wonderful screen version), the main pleasure of reading Segal’s novel is in identifying the 21st century equivalents of the characters and situations in The Age of Innocence. Segal has found a close parallel to claustrophobic old New York society in the tightly-knit Jewish community of Temple Fortune in present-day North West London.
Newland Archer, the young lawyer engaged to the sweet and entirely conventional May Welland, is now Adam Newman, a young lawyer who has just gotten engaged to the sweet and entirely conventional Rachel Gilbert. The Ellen Olenska who turns their safe and predictable existence on its head is Rachel’s cousin Ellie Schneider, recently expelled from Columbia University, New York for appearing in a scandalous movie (From Columbia? Really?). Ellie, like Ellen, has the knack for picking unsuitable men, making foolish decisions, and offending the “right-thinking”.
The strong-willed matriarch Mrs Mingott is now Ziva Schneider, a survivor of the Holocaust who has rebuilt her life in London; the van der Luydens at the top of the social food chain are now the philanthropic Sabahs. As its title suggests, The Innocents is so faithful to the plot points (Aha! the married guy) and narrative arc (She’s going to agree to an earlier wedding in 5, 4, 3…) of The Age of Innocence that it is impossible to read it without thinking of Wharton’s novel. And while Segal’s novel is engaging, witty and often funny, you can’t help but ask why you’re reading this when you could be reading the source.
The main difference between the two books is that Wharton exposes and satirizes the cold savagery of the New York upper class, while Segal embraces the warmth and generosity of the London Jewish community. One goes for the jugular, the other gives you a hug. (Nothing wrong with that if what you want is a hug.)
You know that killer line in The Age of Innocence? “It seemed to take an iron band from his heart to know that, after all, some one had guessed and pitied…And that it should have been his wife moved him indescribably.” When you come to that line in the book (or in the movie), it’s as if someone’s piling rocks on your chest. That emotion, even if it’s not exactly pleasant, that’s what we look for in novels. The Innocents is an enjoyable read; The Age of Innocence moves us indescribably.